A division of labor between the website and CMS can be achieved

[ishanijerin1]

When using an all-in-one CMS, you need to be aware of back-end programs and databases to some extent even just to code. For web coders who want to focus on static coding, this can be stressful and the coding can become complicated.

With a headless CMS, web coders do not need to worry about the CMS during the static coding stage, which relieves them of such stress. It is also possible to turn a completed static website into a dynamic website by adding a CMS like a plugin.

Therefore, in an environment where a headless CMS why choose our service is implemented, static coding and CMS-based management tasks can be completely separated and a division of labor can be established, resulting in more efficient operations.

Specifications can be easily changed
Depending on the CMS, it may be difficult to change specifications once they have been decided. Therefore, it is not possible to accommodate specification changes such as "I would like to make only a certain part of the web page updateable, even though that was not originally anticipated," or "I would like to add content such as a corporate blog."

On the other hand, a headless CMS only manages the data of web pages, so it has almost no involvement in the specifications of the website itself. Even after the website is published, it can flexibly respond to specification changes.

The amount of work required to change specifications is also overwhelmingly less than with traditional CMS, making it ideal for websites that undergo frequent specification changes and will continue to grow in the future.