Managing Partner of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP

[[email protected]]

The browser case also lasted for several years, and Microsoft was eventually found guilty here as well, and was ordered to show the computer owner a so-called "selection window" with the 12 most popular browsers at that time when Windows was first launched. Thus, the user could choose which program was on his way.

Similar investigations began against Google a few years ago. belarus mobile phone numbers database Ironically, the company was among those who joined the lawsuit against Microsoft, and who became almost the main beneficiary of the European Commission's decision on Microsoft (Google's Chrome browser received a good boost after that trial).

Alastair
Chapman
"The precedent of the European Commission v. Microsoft case has certainly had a positive impact on the development of the browser market as a whole. With the help of the selection window, competing browsers, including Google Chrome, were downloaded by users more than 84 million times. They rapidly increased their share of presence and gained popularity. The selection window that appeared when turning on the device contributed to the development of fair competition in the market, introduced uniform "rules of the game" and gave consumers the opportunity to independently choose which web browser they want to use in their future work."

In 2010, Google's major competitors and several smaller companies initiated proceedings in the European Commission, the aim of which was to stop or at least limit Google's anti-competitive practices in the European Internet search market (the company processes more than 90% of European search queries). The EU antitrust regulator began an investigation into how the Internet giant favors its services, pushing relevant search results aside. For example, for absolutely identical queries, some products, especially from the Google Shopping marketplace, appeared higher than those offered by competitors.

Since 2013, the European Commission has also been closely examining Google's work in the Android mobile operating system. Google's competitors believe that by controlling Android, Google is able to promote its services and restrict competitors' access to the platform. For the same reason, the Russian FAS opened a case in 2015.