These lawyers and firms really need to invest in research

[mahbubamim077]

In the middle of the forest, who is going to check all the numbers? And the situation becomes even more interesting when we remember a complementary alternative: the use of existing CNPJs, even if their owners are unaware. In an investigation we heard about, the fraud was discovered when it was realized that it was unlikely that the business would be done with this or that person. When contacted, the administrators claimed to be unaware of the operation, i.e., it was determined that it was a cold operation. And, applying this standard to review the records, several other similar operations were discovered and, through them, a huge hole.

There is no need for such primness. The fact that CNPJs and the people registered in the records exist and are regular does not mitigate the risk of irregularities. Existing CNPJ structures can be used to confuse; they bulk sms austria allow transactions to be registered that have a certain appearance, but in fact have a different purpose, which is done by the influence they have on the various legal entities. This is enough, for example, to establish schemes of simulated circulation of values, which can occur either through payments or through credits that will not be received, will expire, will be renegotiated with discounts, among similar situations.

This is not to mention intermediate forms, such as the circulation of exaggerated or minimized values ​​(selling cheap, buying expensive; overcharging or undercharging), fictitious, undue, among other forms of mischaracterization. The demonstration of fraudulent intent is only possible by measuring different standards: an ordinary one (the corporate common) and an exceptional one (the contrived transaction). It is not usual to adopt that stance; it is found precisely in transactions that could be considered “strange” and, unless there is unequivocal proof to the contrary, are attested to be illicit simulations.